🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are observing closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of states are moving toward comparable measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that phones and apps are "stealing our children's childhood". Legislation is expected to be passed next year.
• Norway is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban remains "a potential options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged parliament to pass a bill raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has advised guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is given. While it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a useful starting point," said a leading European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the government has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Last year, momentum built behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. However, the government vowed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to harmful platform posts argues that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for young users," said a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

Stateside, regulation is mostly happening at the regional level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• The state of Utah requires guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure banning under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation capping minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra access needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed laws requiring guardian approval for teenagers to open social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from some individuals to copy Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Beyond the West, additional countries are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, international agencies strike a more nuanced stance. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The organization notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize user protection.

While this worldwide discussion unfolds, the actions of Australia and others demonstrate that governments globally are increasingly willing to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.